With the sound of military boots ominously drowning that of
players' studs at the moment, it seems to me opportune at this time of
terrorism and war to put a few things into perspective a little, as
several intelligent and sensitive players have done since 11
September. But why, I wonder, do we not manage to keep a sense of
equilibrium when there is no risk over our heads? In peacetime we too
seldom hear people saying that it is "only a football match" and we
instead indulge in all kinds of histrionics, appealing to the whole
world for a penalty, an offside decision or a debatable yellow card,
all of which are of derisory significance in proportion to what the
rest of humanity is all about.
When society loses its bearings so easily without others standing
up and saying Stop, then things have come to a pretty pass. And
referees of various shapes and sizes and colours around the world
would not disagree.
These thoughts passed through my mind when I read a letter recently
that I had received from a promising young referee in a provincial
part of France, whose cry from the heart said: "We are less and less
safe on the regional football pitches of our country (and whose fault
is that?) and referees are losing their credibility so much in the
eyes of the players and spectators as well as of the various
committees despite the reports we submit to them, that I have decided
to face the consequences and to pack up refereeing before I suffer
this growing violence personally. When you think that 150 of my
colleagues have already done the same thing so far this season, this
makes you wonder. I'm not the first and I won't be the last to hang up
my whistle in disappointment, but if I were you I would do the same
before it's too late."
We have to admit that this is anything but an isolated case among
referees in the provinces. There, there are not enough referees to go
round for all the matches being played and it is driving them crazy to
have to train new referees every year only to see them disappear again
just as quickly. The whole procedure seems to be a bit of a waste of
time and the turnover is doing the whole operation little good. Not to
mention the ridiculous situation whereby if there is a referee
available he only gets criticised, while if there are not enough then
everyone cries out for more! Human nature...
As World and European Champions, France has seen the number of
players grow in inverse proportion to the growth rate among referees,
the latter fading like melting snow. And I am well aware that this is
not a phenomenon exclusive to France.
But I am still simple enough to believe that all is not lost as
long as our cry for help can make itself heard by those in charge of
refereeing and by those who have already done so much, even if there
are many reasons why they cannot do as much as they would like. There
is the power of the media, as well as that of money or of political
ambition, and it is never a popular move to impose penalties.
Many efforts have already been made and of course there is no
miraculous recipe for encouraging new candidates because they have
nothing else to do. But I would still like to make a few suggestions,
such as:
- designating a promotional FIFA Year of the Referee, at
international level among the confederations and national
associations
- pushing the message, so often neglected, that football was not
invented for referees (the game existed before they did) but that
human error soon made their introduction necessary
- making teams understand that referees do not grow on trees but
that most of them actually evolve through the clubs themselves, and
so the latter would be well advised to think of this ahead of time
to make sure they are ready for it. And instead of blaming referee
committees for their "incompetent referees", they should remember
these referees are none other than the basic material that has come
through the club system itself. After all, the more candidates there
are, the greater the choice and the better the final quality.
- encouraging promotional campaigns and in the media, making sure
that heavy financial investments are not swallowed up by the
customary counter-publicity of bad examples from top-level
competitions in which players go unpunished for making all kinds of
defamatory gestures or remarks about refereeing decisions, examples
that make potential match officials feel more like going fishing
rather than taking up a career with the whistle.
- applying sanctions without hesitation and regardless of the
players involved, what may be at stake or the level of competition.
As I have said before on this page, I would like to see a code of
conduct integrated into the Laws of the Game to reduce the pressure
on referees, with a more uniform approach to disciplinary measures
for those who damage the game or its officials. This would help to
eliminate misunderstandings.
Moreover, I think we should also sell our own image better by not
always talking about the stigma attached to our job when in fact the
truly devoted referee would never give it up for all the gold in the
world. And maybe the time has come to change our tune by putting the
absolute priority on the many good reasons for taking up a career that
offers more pleasure than pain, the latter even being useful as it
helps our development as human beings.
Speaking personally, I do not know what football is supposed to owe
me, but I do know what I owe refereeing. What I could not learn from a
book I learnt from my years with a whistle, and I have absolutely no
hesitation in saying so.